|
AMERICAN
ACADEMY OF COSMETIC DENTISTRY
ACCREDITATION
REVIEW
CASE REPORT 3
SIX INDIRECT VENEERS
INTRODUCTION
Bonded porcelain
laminate veneers are ideal restorations for a variety of aesthetic
and functional
problems1. The conservative
nature of the preparations combined with desirable light reflection,
absorption and transmission properties make these restorations
predictably blend with existing natural dentition. This case
placed exceptional demands on technique and materials as the
two maxillary central incisors were left unprepared and six
feldspathic porcelain veneers were created to enhance the
smile and improve the occlusion.
HISTORY
The patient was
a 29 year-old female in excellent health but did take ibuprofen
on a fairly regular basis for headaches and was taking Paxil
to reduce anxiety. Her desire was to have a fuller, lighter
smile where her two front teeth were not so prominent. She
worked in the area of medical sales and knew that a sophisticated
natural smile would be an important asset to her career. As
a teenager, she had orthodontics to correct a Class II malocclusion
with a congenitally missing tooth #5. She also had her third
molars removed.
Past dental treatment
had been regular recall examinations and prophylaxes with
several molars having been restored with amalgam restorations.
She was referred by a friend to our practice for a cosmetic
consultation to improve her smile.
CLINICAL
DATA
Oral and radiographic
examinations revealed good oral health with the exceptions
of gingivitis interproximally and tenderness to palpation
of some of the muscles of mastication. Excessive wear was
noted on teeth # 11/22 and 12/21. The maxillary central incisors
exhibited irregular incisal edges and were disproportionately
large as compared with the laterals2.
Because
of the absence of tooth #5, teeth #s 2, 3and 4 were positioned
mesial to their usual position. The space had been closed
orthodontically and the teeth were in the proper vertical
orientation.
The tempromandibular
joints were quiet but the patient did report a history of
chronic headaches and was aware of bruxing. She was especially
tender to palpation on the left lateral pterygoid, medial
pterygoid and masseter. She had canine guidance in right lateral
excursion with no non- working interferences. In left lateral
excursion, there was group function with non-working interferences
on the lingual cusps of the contralateral side. Protrusively,
she functioned only on the maxillary centrals and the mandibular
incisors.
The shade of her
dentition was generally A-3 on the Vita shade guide, with
some gingival areas being A-3.5. 
DIAGNOSIS
Unaesthetic smile
due to disproportionate maxillary anterior dentition coupled
with a shade the patient considered too dark. Myofacial pain
and headaches caused by an unbalanced occlusal pattern aggravated
by bruxing. 
TREATMENT
PLAN
After taking diagnostic
models a careful analysis of the occlusion and review of the
clinical data, a treatment plan was developed. It answered
the patient's desire for a more aesthetic smile while at the
same time improved the occlusal pattern to reduce the myofacial
pain.
The patient whitened
her teeth for approximately 2 weeks using Discus Dental 16%
carbomide peroxide Nite White Excel whitening gel about 1
month prior to veneer preparation. A two-week period was allowed
to elapse after whitening for shade stabilization at Vita
shade of A-1 in the incisal 2/3 while the gingival 1/3 was
a Vita A-2.
A composite cosmetic
mock-up was done on teeth #s 4, 6, 7, 10, 11 and 12 to determine
proper incisogingival, mesiodistal and buccal proportions
and positions. During
the mock-up, it was decided that leaving the maxillary central
incisors unprepared except for some incisal recontouring and
mesiodistal narrowing would be desirable. To simulate reduction
and recontouring of the incisal edge a black Sharpie Microtip
marking pen was used to block out the tooth structure to later
be shaped. The results were photographed with an Olympus 600
DL digital camera and through computer manipulation were placed
side by side with a before photograph of the patient. After
the patient had approved of the aesthetic result, an alginate
impression was taken that was later used in the fabrication
of the diagnostic wax-up.
The material chosen
for the veneers was Vita Omega 100 feldspathic porcelain overplayed
with Ceramco Finesse low fusing porcelain. These materials
provide excellent esthetics due to the ability of the ceramist
to build the shade, opacifications, translucencies and characterizations
from the internal of the restorations3.
Low fusing porcelain on the external gave a highly polishable
surface with an abrasive index similar to enamel4.
Even though the strength of this material was slightly less
than many of the cast ceramics5
proper preparation design, control of excessive occlusal forces
and precise bonding protocols made this the material of choice
for the aesthetically demanding case.
Armamentarium
(significant):
- Vivadent Helioprogress
microfill composite shade A-1
- Daler-Rowney
Cryla #4 C30 flat end sable brush
- Olympus 600
DL digital camera
- Dentsply Jeltrate
fast set alginate
- Discus Dental
Nite White Excel 16% carbomide peroxide whitening gel
- Milestone
Scientific The Wand anesthesia delivery apparatus
- Cook-Waite
Marcaine 0.5% with epinephrine 1:200,000 anesthetic solution
- Hygienic extra
heavy rubber dam
- Vic Pollard
diamond rotary burs (66R, 86R, 102, 103)
- Pulpdent etching
gel (38%)
- Parkell bowed
cheek retractors
- Kerr Extrude
polyvinyl siloxane impression materials (tray and syringable)
- Zimmerman
Tray Tree (telephone 425 823-5097)
- 0.12% chlorhexidine
solution
- Dentsply Caulk
Regisil bite registration material
- Espe Protemp
temporary material (A-1)
- Cosmodent
Creative Color composite tints
- NTI finishing
diamonds (889-009F, 859-014F, 379-018F)
- Midwest finishing
burs (7902, 7404)
- Dentsply Caulk
Enhance finishing cups
- Centrix Benda
-brush
- Washington
Scientific 35mm clinical camera
- Sonicare ultrasonic
toothbrush
- Butler floss
threaders
- Glide floss
and tape
- 3M Ceramic
primer
- Heraeus Kulzer
Gluma
- Vivadent Excite
resin adhesive
- Vivadent Dual
Cement
- Glycerin
- #12 Bard-Parker
scalpel blade
- Horico interproximal
separating strips
- Brassler interproximal
diamond finishing strips
- Epitex interproximal
finishing strips
- Axis porcelain
polishing cups (P0355, P0365, P30035)
- Brassler extra
thin perforated diamond disc (806-104)
- Vident porcelain
polishing paste
- Danville Engineering
Microetcher with 50 micron aluminum oxide
- Optilux 401
curing light with turbo tip
- Demetron 2mm
curing tip
- Kreative Kuring
light
- Design for
Vision 4.3x surgical telescopes
- Oroscoptic
Zeon Illuminator
- Vita shade
guide
- Buffalo clear
temporary stent thermoplastic material (.020")

PREPARATION
A diagnostic wax
-up was done prior to the preparation appointment using the
model of the cosmetic mock-up as a guide. A polyvinyl siloxane
matrix was constructed for intra-oral temporary fabrication
following the preparation of the teeth. A sulcular groove
cut into the diagnostic model allowed for the excess temporary
material to be easily and rapidly removed following temporary
fabrication. A reduction guide was made with .020 clear thermoplastic
stent material on a vacuum-forming machine and was used to
optimize the preparations.
A Vita shade of
A-1 for the incisal 2/3rds and A-2 for the gingival 1/3rd
was selected. The AACD photographic series was taken with
additional views of full centric occlusion, protrusive, right
and left lateral excursions and shade tabs in place.
Anesthesia was
delivered with The Wand using 2% Marcaine and a rubber dam
was placed.
The maxillary
centrals were recontoured and refined first with careful attention
given to the plane of the incisal edge and it's perpendicularity
to the long axis of the face. The mesiodistal width was narrowed
slightly to allow for a more aesthetic proportion.
Teeth #s 4, 6,
7, 10,11 and 12 were prepared using the reduction guide to
verify ideal contours. The preparations were all supragingival
and no retraction cord was needed. Finishing was done with
an Axis porcelain polishing cup (PO355) to remove any sharp
areas that potentially could place excessive isolated stress
on the restoration and cause a fracture.
The teeth were
impressed with Kerr Extrude polyvinyl siloxane impression
material and the impression was carefully examined for accuracy
under magnification. An opposing model was taken with alginate
and immediately poured and placed in a humidified box that
was designed to hold the tray by the tray handle (Zimmerman
Z-Tray Tree). This technique greatly reduces the incidence
of distortion. A bite registration was recorded with Regisil
and a Benda-brush was placed to parallel the aesthetic plane
and a full facial photograph was taken before the registration
was removed. This plane was transferred to the working models
and gave the ceramist a clearly defined reference while the
incisal edges were being established. The photograph was used
as an additional reference in the laboratory by providing
facial landmarks.
The preparations
were scrubbed with 0.12% chlorhexidine, rinsed, spot etched
with phosphoric acid for 15 seconds, rinsed and lightly dried
then coated with Excite adhesive resin. A matrix made from
the diagnostic model was filled with A-1 Protemp, placed on
the preparations and carefully trimmed in place. The temporaries
were then stained with Cosmodent Creative Color tints to create
lifelike characterizations. This allowed the patient to see
and verbalize her specific likes and dislikes about the temporaries
which was then communicated to the ceramist.
An alginate impression
was taken and poured in Whipmix Snapstone. A vacuum formed
stent was made from .020" thermoplastic clear temporary material,
trimmed and given to the patient to wear at night to protect
the temporaries. This was especially important in this case
because the temporaries did not cross the midline and hence
were much more prone to breakage. However, because of the
spot etching and the temporary stent, the temporaries stayed
attached and did not break. 

LABORATORY
INSTRUCTIONS
A prescription
was written to the laboratory instructing them to make six
feldspathic porcelain veneers for teeth #s 4, 6, 7, 10, 11
and 12. Included were photographs, a diagnostic wax-up, study
models, temporary models, shade and texture information.
Using the study
models, the ceramist was instructed to duplicate the facial
surface texture and anatomy of the existing dentition. Specific
directions were given to establish a well-defined canine guidance
and to move the buccal surfaces of the bicuspids buccally.
Due to the relatively short clinical crown length of the lateral
incisors, addition of slight vertical depressions in the facial
surface were used to give the illusion of a longer tooth.
The refractory
models were returned for review and modification before divesting
and finishing of the veneers.

FINISHING
The fit and form
of the veneers was checked on the models and a detailed inspection
was done with transillumination under magnification to verify
no stress fractures had developed. The internal aspect of
each restoration was inspected for a frosty looking appearance
indicative of adequate etching. Translucencies, opacities
and characterizations were also carefully reviewed.
Anesthesia was
delivered using 2% Mepivicaine with 1:20,000 levonordefrin
and the temporaries were removed. The teeth were cleaned and
scrubbed with .12% chlorhexidine and the restorations were
tried dry to verify fits then with water to transmit color
from the underlying tooth structure. The shape, shade and
fit as all deemed acceptable and the veneers were removed
and prepared for cementation.
A split rubber
dam was placed and the teeth were rinsed and again scrubbed
with chlorhexidine. Another rinse was followed by etching
with 38% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds. Teeth were etched
three at a time, then lightly dried and coated with Tublicid
Red. After evaporating the Tublicid, Excite resin adhesive
was applied continuously for 15 seconds, air thinned and light
cured.
Simultaneously,
the restorations were prepared by first being rinsed, dried
and acidified using liquid 35% phosphoric acid. Again after
drying, Ceramic primer (silane) was applied and left in place
for a minimum of 1 minute. The internal surface was then dried
a final time and a thin coating of Excite adhesive was air
thinned on the restorations and they were placed into a light
protected box.
Vivadent Dual
Cement was mixed and placed inside the restorations and three
were placed at a time on each side. A dual cure was chosen
to insure complete polymerization of the resin cement and
since the gingival shade was slightly yellow the concern of
the yellowing of the cement over time was not an issue. After
initially seating the restorations they were spot tacked at
the gingival with a 2mm light tip and Glide tape was passed
through the proximal areas to remove excess cement. A Benda-brush
and rubber tips were used to remove excess facial and lingual
cement and a layer of glycerin applied prior to curing with
Optilux 401 and 501 curing lights.
Excess cured cement
was then removed with a #12 Bard-Parker and NTI finishing
diamonds. Interproximal areas were cleaned and finished using
a Horico interproximal separating strip, Brassler diamond
and Epitex finishing strips. NTI finishing diamonds were used
to finalize the occlusion and place incisal characteristics.
A Brassler ultra-thin perforated diamond disc was used to
refine the incisal embrasures before polishing with Axis porcelain
polishing cups and Vident porcelain polishing paste.
Impressions were
taken for a maxillary acrylic night guard that was delivered
and adjusted at a subsequent appointment along with a check
for any excessive cement. Final intra-oral photos and a portrait
session were completed. 
SUMMARY
AND CONCLUSION
All ceramic restorations
provided an exceptional result for this challenging functional
and aesthetic case. By recontouring the two maxillary central
incisors, whitening and judicious placement of six porcelain
veneers this was state of the art conservative adhesive dentistry.
Establishment
of canine and protrusive guidance with simultaneous elimination
of non-working interferences has led to fewer headaches for
this patient through a probable decrease in neuromuscular
activity that has been translated into less bruxing6,7,8,9,10.
Aesthetically,
the patient was extremely pleased with the natural and full
appearance of her new lighter smile. The beautiful translucencies
and surface texture of the final result make these restorations
truly invisible.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The
author would like to thank Mr. Lennart Hoerler and Mr. Alan
Wollman of PR Dental Laboratory of Kirkland, Washington for
their attention to detail and the excellent aesthetics of
this case. 
REFERENCES
- Miller, M.,
The Techniques: Section 3, Porcelain and Indirect Resin
Veneers; Reality 1999: 3-333
- Spear, F.,
The maxillary central incisal edge: a key to esthetic and
functional treatment planning. Aurum Cer Den Lab News, 1998;
2(4):1-5.
- Cornell, D.
and Winter, R., Manipulating light with the refractive index
of an all-ceramic material; Pract Perio and Aesthet Dent;
October 1999, pp.913-917.
- Lehner, C.R.,
All ceramic crowns; Current Opin Dent; 1992; 1:45-52.
- van Dijken,
J., All ceramic restorations: classification and clinical
evaluations; Comp of Cont Ed Dent; December 1999; pp.1115-1134.
- Manns, A.,
et al., The immediate effect of the variation of the anteroposterior
laterotrusive contacts on the elevator EMG activity. J Craniomand
Pract 1993; 11: 184-191.
- Hunt, K. and
Haupt, J., Bioesthetics: An interdisciplinary approach to
improve function and appearance. AACD Journal, Spring 1998;
pp.36-44.
- Williamson,
E.H., Anterior guidance: it's effect on electromyographic
activity of the temporal and masseter muscles. J Prosthet
Dent 1983; 49: 816-823.
- Shupe, R.J.,
et al., Effects of occlusal guidance on muscle activity.
J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51: 811-818.
- Kerstein,
R.B., and Wright, N., Electromyographic and computer analyses
of patients suffering from chronic myofascial pain dysfunction
syndrome before and after treatment with immediate anterior
guidance development. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66: 677-686.

|
|
INTRO
| CASE 1
| CASE 2
| CASE 3
| CASE 4
| CASE 5
©
copyright 2001, Rhys Spoor DDS
|